Annotated King Reference Manual/Expressions
This page is work in progress.
Names
Examples
-
Syntax
name ::=
direct_name
| indexed_component | slice
| selected_component | attribute_reference
| type_conversion | function_call
| character_literal | qualified_expression
direct_name ::= identifier | operator_symbol
prefix ::= name
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Indexed Components
Examples
-
Syntax
indexed_component ::= sequence_component | map_component sequence_component ::= prefix [expression] map_component ::= prefix (expression)
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Slices
Examples
-
Syntax
slice ::= prefix [discrete_range] discrete_range ::= discrete_subtype_indication | range_specification
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Selected Components
Examples
-
Syntax
selected_component ::= prefix . selector_name selector_name ::= identifier | character_literal | operator_symbol
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Attributes
Examples
-
Syntax
attribute_reference ::= prefix'attribute_designator attribute_designator ::= identifier [actual_parameter_part] | delta | digits range_attribute_reference ::= prefix'range_attribute_designator range_attribute_designator ::= range
Rationale
-
Discussion
Attribute functions can have multiple arguments, which need not be static. Consider 'Image for numeric types, with such parameters as Width, Base, ...
-> I was wondering also about Ada. I guess that attribute functions are deferencing just by the identifier as a function name and then the function signature applies. (PP)
It should probably be
identifier [actual_parameter_part]
Changed. (PP)
Aggregates
Examples
-
Syntax
aggregate ::= record_aggregate | map_aggregate | sequence_aggregate | set_aggregate
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Record Aggregates
Examples
-
Syntax
record_aggregate ::= record_subtype_mark'(record_component_association_list)
record_component_association_list ::=
record_component_association {, record_component_association}
| null
record_component_association ::=
component_choice_list => expression
| component_choice_list => <>
component_choice_list ::=
component_selector_name {| component_selector_name}
| others
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Map Aggregates
Examples
-
Syntax
map_aggregate ::= map_subtype_mark'(null_map_aggregate | named_map_aggregate)
null_map_aggregate ::= null
named_map_aggregate ::= map_element_association_list
map_element_association_list ::= map_element_association {, map_element_association}
map_element_association ::=
key_choice_list => expression
| key_choice_list => <>
| iterated_element_association
key_choice_list ::= key_choice {| key_choice}
key_choice ::= key_expression | discrete_range
iterated_element_association ::=
for loop_parameter_specification[ use key_expression] => expression
| for iterator_specification[ use key_expression] => expression
Rationale
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Sequence Aggregates
Examples
-
Syntax
sequence_aggregate ::= sequence_subtype_mark'[
positional_sequence_aggregate [named_sequence_aggregate]
| null_sequence_aggregate
| named_sequence_aggregate
]
positional_sequence_aggregate ::=
expression {, expression}
null_sequence_aggregate ::= null
named_sequence_aggregate ::=
sequence_component_association_list
sequence_component_association_list ::=
sequence_component_association {, sequence_component_association}
sequence_component_association ::=
discrete_choice_list => expression
| discrete_choice_list => <>
Rationale
-
Discussion
others is only allowed for bounded sequences. I don't recall if it is part of discrete choice list, but it should be allowed in named associations for bounded sequences.
-> I can't figure out how to define a bounded sequence. Any example? (PP)
I've decided to eliminate bounded sequences
Aggregates of a single value are allowedː S'[7]
named_sequence_aggregate seems to have 2 choices that are the same (JC)
Changed. (PP)
Set Aggregates
Examples
-
Syntax
set_aggregate ::= set_subtype_mark'{
positional_set_aggregate
| null_set_aggregate
| all_set_aggregate
}
positional_set_aggregate ::=
expression {, expression}
null_set_aggregate ::= null
all_set_aggregate ::= all
Rationale
all is only allowed if the universe type is discrete and finite.
Discussion
Actually, others makes no sense for set aggregates. Sorry
Aggregates with a single value are allowedː S'̪7ˈ(JC)
Changed. (PP)
Expressions
Examples
-
Syntax
expression ::=
relation {and relation} | relation {and then relation}
| relation {or relation} | relation {or else relation}
| relation {xor relation}
choice_expression ::=
choice_relation {and choice_relation}
| choice_relation {or choice_relation}
| choice_relation {xor choice_relation}
| choice_relation {and then choice_relation}
| choice_relation {or else choice_relation}
choice_relation ::= simple_expression [relational_operator simple_expression]
relation ::=
simple_expression [relational_operator simple_expression]
| tested_simple_expression [not] in membership_choice_list
membership_choice_list ::= membership_choice {| membership_choice}
membership_choice ::= choice_simple_expression | range | subtype_mark
simple_expression ::= term {binary_adding_operator term}
term ::= factor {multiplying_operator factor}
factor ::= [unary_adding_operator] primary [^ [unary_adding_operator] primary]
| not primary
| \ primary
primary ::=
numeric_literal | null | string_literal | aggregate
| name | (expression)
| (conditional_expression) | (quantified_expression)
| (declare_expression)
Rationale
-
Discussion
Remember that King allows a unary operator to follow a binary operator without parenthesesː 10.0 ^ -9. I don't think these rules allow that.
-> Changed. (PP)
Seems that A * -B is still not OK (JC)
Decomposition:
factor multiplying_operator factor
factor -> primary -> A
multiplying_operator -> *
factor -> unary_adding_operator primary -> -B
Is it correct? (PP)
Operators
Examples
-
Syntax
logical_operator ::= and | or | xor relational_operator ::= = | /= | < | <= | > | >= binary_adding_operator ::= + | - | & unary_adding_operator ::= + | - multiplying_operator ::= * | / | mod | rem exponentiation_operator ::= ^ highest_precedence_operator ::= ^ | not | \ | unary_adding_operator
Rationale
-
Discussion
Unary operators, including not, have the highest precedence, to allow unary operators to follow binary operators without parentheses. Don't forget the "\" unary operator.
-> Changed. (PP)
All unary operators have highest precedence. You need something like
binary_adding_operator
multiplying_operator
exponentiation_operator ::= ^
highest_precedence_operator
with all the unary operators part of highest_precedence_operator (JC)
Conditional Expressions
Examples
-
Syntax
conditional_expression ::= if_expression | case_expression
if_expression ::=
if condition then dependent_expression
{else_if condition then dependent_expression}
else dependent_expression
condition ::= boolean_expression
case_expression ::=
case selecting_expression is
case_expression_alternative {,
case_expression_alternative}
case_expression_alternative ::=
when discrete_choice_list =>
dependent_expression
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Quantified Expressions
Examples
-
Syntax
quantified_expression ::=
for quantifier loop_parameter_specification => predicate
| for quantifier iterator_specification => predicate
quantifier ::= all | some
predicate ::= boolean_expression
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Declare Expressions
Examples
-
Syntax
declare_expression ::=
declare declare_declaration {declare_declaration}
begin body_expression
Rationale
-
Discussion
The declarations of a declare expression are limited to constants and subtypes. You dealt with this already elsewhere IIRC.
Note added. (PP)
Does not include subtypes (JC)
Changed. (PP)
Type Conversions
Examples
-
Syntax
type_conversion ::= subtype_mark (expression)
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Qualified Expressions
Examples
-
Syntax
qualified_expression ::= subtype_mark'(expression)
Rationale
-
Discussion
-
Function calls
Examples
-
Syntax
function_call ::=
function_name
| function_prefix actual_parameter_part
Rationale
-
Discussion
-