Wikibooks:Requests for permissions/Webaware

This user is generally active on both staff lounge and VfD, and has had over 2300 edits in his time here. His input is always very helpful, respectful, and insightful. He has been here for nearly a year, and has demonstrated himself to be trustworthy. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 00:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[]

Decline - I don't believe that I have sufficient experience with WB to be a good admin, and I don't have the time to attain that experience without impacting my already lagging contributions. I'm happy to continue with some of the mindless admin-like work of cleaning up articles and checking images tagged {{nld}}, but would rather not take on any more admin work at present. cheers, Webaware ^talk 04:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[]

Nomination declined. Will be archived in a few days. -withinfocus 13:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[]

I've been watching the RC feed the last couple days, and one name keeps popping up: Webaware. This user has been diligently performing maintenance tasks at a very high level. He's been dealing with vandalism and spam, tagging images, and generally just working to make Wikibooks a better place. Considering the work he is doing, and the quality with which he has been doing it, it only makes good sense that he should be given the tools to do what he does, better. This is the second nomination of this user, the first time was declined, and I sincerely hope that the community finds him to be as helpful as I have found him to be. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 02:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Accept Webaware ^talk 02:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

- and thanks to all for your support. Webaware ^talk 23:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[]

Support - Enthusiastically! --Jomegat 03:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Support - = D --Az1568 ^(Talk) 04:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Support - Looks good --Krischik ^T 07:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Support Ooooh now I'm peeved! How many times did I ask..... Great user, good interaction with others, well trusted. Strong support here (& he can get his own back <g>) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Support! - Very positive contributor to the project, and should certainly have the buttons available should they come in handy. --SB_Johnny | ^talk 08:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Support - Certainly fits the definition of a "trusted user" that is required for adminship. And has come to know Wikibooks policies. I don't see a problem here, and we can certainly use more admins. --Rob Horning 11:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Support - has the full trust of the community clearly and about time he was given admin functions. Xania ^talk 18:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

Support --AdRiley 20:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[]

• Hurray, you accepted this time! =D Webaware is definitely a "trusted" user, is very active, and will be a benefit to the project as an administrator. I endorse Whiteknight's nomination. --Iamunknown 19:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[]

Support - Im surprised Webaware's not an admin already. Mattb112885 (talk) 22:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[]

Support --xixtas ^talk 23:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[]

Support --Panic 05:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[]

Seven days of all positive votes. Webaware is now a sysop. -withinfocus 21:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[]

• Last Contribution: June 17 2008
• Last Tool Use: June 17 2008

Per policy on inactivity. User may request tools again should they become active and have a need for them again.

Support I'm overwhelmed with other stuff, but hope to return to WB at some future time. Best off to remove the tools for now. cheers, Webaware ^talk 12:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[]

Thanks for your honesty. If you wish, you can have your tools removed yourself with a request on m:SRP.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^talk 13:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[]

Done Removed at Meta Kylu (talk) 03:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[]