Hydrogen economy
The hydrogen economy is a term for the role hydrogen as an energy carrier to complement electricity as part a long-term option to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The aim is to reduce emissions where cheaper and more energy-efficient clean solutions are not available.[2]: 1 In this context, hydrogen economy encompasses the production of hydrogen and the use of hydrogen in ways that contribute to phasing-out fossil fuels and limiting climate change.
Hydrogen can be produced by several means. Most hydrogen produced today is gray hydrogen, made from natural gas through steam methane reforming (SMR). This process accounted for 1.8% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2021.[3] Low-carbon hydrogen, which is made using SMR with carbon capture and storage (blue hydrogen), or through electrolysis of water using renewable power (green hydrogen), accounted for less than 1% of production.[4] Of the 100 million tonnes[5] of hydrogen produced in 2021, 43% was used in oil refining and 57% in industry, principally in the manufacture of ammonia for fertilizers, and methanol.[6]: 18, 22, 29
To limit global warming, it is generally envisaged that the future hydrogen economy replaces gray hydrogen with low-carbon hydrogen. As of 2024 it is unclear when enough low-carbon hydrogen could be produced to phase-out all the gray hydrogen.[7] The future end-uses are likely in heavy industry (e.g. high-temperature processes alongside electricity, feedstock for production of green ammonia and organic chemicals, as alternative to coal-derived coke for steelmaking), long-haul transport (e.g. shipping, and to a lesser extent hydrogen-powered aircraft and heavy goods vehicles), and long-term energy storage.[8][9] Other applications, such as light duty vehicles and heating in buildings, are no longer part of the future hydrogen economy, primarily for economic and environmental reasons.[10][11] Hydrogen is challenging to store, to transport in pipelines, and to use. It presents safety concerns since it is highly explosive, and it is inefficient compared to direct use of electricity. Since relatively small amounts of low-carbon hydrogen are available, climate benefits can be maximized by using it in harder-to-decarbonize applications.[11]
As of 2023 there are no real alternatives to hydrogen for several chemical processes in which it is currently used, such as ammonia production for fertilizer.[12] The cost of low- and zero-carbon hydrogen is likely to influence the degree to which it will be used in chemical feedstocks, long haul aviation and shipping, and long-term energy storage. Production costs of low- and zero-carbon hydrogen are evolving.[13] Future costs may be influenced by carbon taxes, the geography and geopolitics of energy, energy prices, technology choices, and their raw material requirements.[14] The U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Hotshot Initiative seeks to reduce the cost of green hydrogen drop to $1 a kilogram during the 2030s,[15] though the cost of electrolyzers rose 50% between 2021 and 2024.[16]
- ^ International Renewable Energy Agency (2022-03-29). "World Energy Transitions Outlook 1-5C Pathway 2022 edition". IRENA. p. 227. Retrieved 2023-10-06.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Yap-2023was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Greenhouse gas emissions totalled 49.3 Gigatonnes CO2e in 2021."Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2020 and Preliminary 2021 Estimates". Rhodium Group. 19 December 2022. Retrieved 2023-09-21.
- ^ "Hydrogen". IEA. 10 July 2023. "Energy" section. Retrieved 2023-09-21.
- ^ "Hydrogen". IEA. Retrieved 2024-03-24.
- ^ IEA (2022). Global Hydrogen Review 2022. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 2023-08-25.
- ^ "Hydrogen could be used for nearly everything. It probably shouldn't be". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2024-05-13.
- ^ IPCC (2022). Shukla, P.R.; Skea, J.; Slade, R.; Al Khourdajie, A.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (PDF). Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press (In Press). pp. 91–92. doi:10.1017/9781009157926. ISBN 9781009157926.
- ^ IRENA (2021). "World Energy Transitions Outlook: 1.5 °C Pathway". International Renewable Energy Agency. Abu Dhabi. p. 95. Retrieved 2023-09-21.
- ^ Plötz, Patrick (2022-01-31). "Hydrogen technology is unlikely to play a major role in sustainable road transport". Nature Electronics. 5 (1): 8–10. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00706-6. ISSN 2520-1131. S2CID 246465284.
- ^ a b Rosenow, Jan (September 2022). "Is heating homes with hydrogen all but a pipe dream? An evidence review". Joule. 6 (10): 2225–2228. Bibcode:2022Joule...6.2225R. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.015. S2CID 252584593.
- ^ Barnard, Michael (2023-10-22). "What's New On The Rungs Of Liebreich's Hydrogen Ladder?". CleanTechnica. Retrieved 2024-02-17.
- ^ Sasidhar, Nallapaneni (30 November 2023). "Carbon Neutral Fuels and Chemicals from Standalone Biomass Refineries". Indian Journal of Environment Engineering. 3 (2): 1–8. doi:10.54105/ijee.B1845.113223.
- ^ Goldman Sachs Research. "Carbonomics: The Clean Hydrogen Revolution". Goldman Sachs. pp. 4–6. Retrieved 2023-09-25.
- ^ "Hydrogen Hotshot Initiative". DOE. 31 August 2021.
- ^ Bettenhausen, Craig. "Green hydrogen is still making gains", Chemical and Engineering News, May 8, 2025