Franklin v. Parke-Davis

Franklin v. Parke-Davis
CourtUnited States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Full case name United States of America ex rel. David Franklin v. Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert Company
DecidedAugust 22, 2003
Docket nos.1:96-cv-11651
Citation2003 WL 22048255
Case history
Prior actionsMotion to dismiss granted in part, denied in part, 147 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D. Mass. 2001); protective order modified, 210 F.R.D. 257 (D. Mass. 2002).
Holding
Off-label promotion of pharmaceutical products which causes false claims for payment under the federal Medicaid program is a valid theory of recovery under the False Claims Act.
Court membership
Judge sittingPatti B. Saris
Keywords
False Claims Act

Franklin v. Parke-Davis is a lawsuit filed in 1996 against Parke-Davis, a division of Warner-Lambert Company, and eventually against Pfizer (which bought Warner-Lambert in 2000) under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act.[1] The suit was commenced by David Franklin, a microbiologist hired in the spring of 1996 in a sales capacity at Parke-Davis, a pharmaceutical subsidiary of Warner-Lambert (Warner-Lambert was subsequently acquired by Pfizer in 2000).[2] In denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment, the court for the first time recognized off-label promotion of drugs could cause Medicaid to pay for prescriptions that were not reimbursable, triggering False Claims Act liability. The case was also significant in exposing the degree to which publication bias impacts the randomized controlled studies conducted by pharmaceutical companies to test the efficacy of their products.[2] Ultimately, the parties reached a settlement agreement of $430 million to resolve all civil claims and criminal charges stemming from the qui tam complaint.[3][4] At the time of the settlement in May 2004, it represented one of the largest False Claims Act recoveries against a pharmaceutical company in U.S. history, and was the first off-label promotion settlement under the False Claims Act.[5][6]: 194 

  1. ^ U.S. ex rel. Franklin v. Parke-Davis, Div. of Warner-Lambert Co., No. CIV.A.96–11651PBS, 2003 WL 22048255, at *1 (D. Mass. Aug. 22, 2003) 2003 Decision
  2. ^ a b Melody Petersen, Our Daily Meds: How the Pharmaceutical Companies Transformed Themselves into Slick Marketing Machines and Hooked the Nation on Prescription Drugs, New York: Sarah Crichton Books (2008).
  3. ^ "Press Release: Warner-Lambert to Pay $430 Million to Resolve Criminal & Civil Health Care Liability Relating to Off-Label Promotion". US Department of Justice. May 13, 2004.
  4. ^ Krautkramer, Christian J. (June 1, 2006). "Neurontin and Off-Label Marketing". The Virtual Mentor. 8 (6): 397–402. doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.6.hlaw1-0606. PMID 23234671.
  5. ^ Joseph JN, et al. Enforcement Related to Off-Label Marketing and Use of Drugs and Devices: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law 2(2):73-108. January 2009
  6. ^ David S. Torborg The Dark Side of the Boom: The Peculiar Dilemma of Modern False Claims Act Litigation 26 J.L. & Health 181 (2013)